ge4658950185257527766
ge5157703694664227414
ge4746188699957553268
ge5410687308286304413
ge4670961798688621701
John Carey8 Feb 2009
REVIEW

Ford Territory v Holden Sportwagon

Need a vehicle that's more 'workhorse' than 'wild stallion'? Then your choice is either SUV or wagon. So which makes the best family hauler?

Across the divide
Ford Territory TS v Holden Sportwagon SV6

Two or three kids, with friends and gear, who require frequent ferrying to and fro? Holiday breaks spent driving to visit favourite family? Keen on leisure-time activities that involve heaps of hardware? All of the above? Cars that wrap a family-size helping of flexible user-friendliness in an affordable package, with a degree of genuine driver appeal, aren't what we all want. But they're exactly what many need through the family-raising, active-lifestyle phases of life.

There's always going to be a place in the price list at the back of this magazine for things like the Ford Territory and Holden Commodore Sportwagon. Miserable, self-righteous and slightly hysterical car-haters might label them gas-guzzlers without a second thought, or even a first, but all the odium in the world doesn't alter the fact that some people really do require XL-size transport.

It was back in 2004 that the Territory won our Car of the Year award, but the Australian-designed and developed wagon is far from past it. Just the opposite, in fact. Driving one after a long gap you're inevitably impressed by its all-round competence ... and reminded that nothing better (for a similar price) has been launched in the intervening years.

While the Territory was the result of Ford's decision to blur the lines between people mover, SUV and traditional car-based wagon, Holden's Sportwagon is something else. Commodore-derived, it's identical to the 2006 COTY-winning sedan from nose to somewhere aft of its B-pillar. Like every other wagon Holden has ever made. What's changed is that this time they decided to create one with visual appeal. Instead of the hearse-like long wheelbase of the previous generation, Sportwagon instead shares this dimension with the VE Commodore sedan. And the cargo compartment has been shaped to satisfy the eye every bit as much as the desire for bulk cubic capacity. It's the perfect choice for a style-conscious customer looking for SUV-like space, but with greater fuel efficiency and driving dynamism, says Holden. Are they right? Let's find out ...

As with Commodore sedan, the SV6 is proving the version of Sportwagon most often chosen by individual customers. One of those, then. And, obviously, a Territory close to the Sportwagon's $42,790 base price. While the AWD version of the Ford, in base TX-spec, is a few hundred more than the Holden, we chose instead the middle model TS, with RWD. For two reasons. First, Territory RWD outsells the AWD, and the equipment of the TS is a closer match for the SV6's list. The base $43,990 list price of the Ford is $1700 more than the Holden (before haggling, anyway), but the test TS also had the optional third-row seat added.

They might look quite different, but beneath the skin there are plenty of similarities. Both, for example, use a four-link design for their coil-spring rear suspensions. And both have a front-mounted steering rack, for superior steering precision. Four-wheel disc brakes are another common point. Finally, while the Ford has a double A-arm front suspension and the Holden simpler struts, both use double ball joint lower arms.

There's significant departure when it comes to engines. Territory has a capacity advantage and transmission ratio handicap, the Sportwagon is the other way round. Ford's big, Australian-made 4.0-litre in-line six may be destined for extinction in 2013, but it's benefited from decades of steady development and is both smooth and muscular. But it's hitched to an automatic transmission with only four speeds. Holden's GM-designed and Australian-assembled 3.6-litre V6 naturally has less torque (340Nm to the Ford's 383Nm), but revs harder to produce a fraction more power (195kW to 190kW). The Holden engine's V-layout lacks the supreme six-cylinder smoothness of an in-line design, but it is partnered with an imported five-speed automatic that guarantees smaller steps between gears.

For both performance and fuel economy, the Holden commands a clear advantage. Not only is the Sportwagon swifter by a useful margin, it also consumed significantly less fuel than the Ford during the 750km-plus course of this test. In fact, the Territory sucked 18 percent more unleaded than the Sportwagon over the distance, rather more than the eight percent extra indicated by the official ADR81 consumption test. No surprise here; the Ford is heavier (by almost 200kg) and certainly has greater aero drag to overcome, thanks mainly to its larger frontal area.

Still, the Ford drivetrain has its advantages. For refinement the in-line engine is markedly better than the Holden V6. It's an issue Holden obviously recognises. And while the four-speed auto might blunt performance a little (first gear is very tall, so off-the-mark acceleration isn't exactly explosive) the transmission otherwise is hard to fault. It picks the right gear, and holds it for the right amount of time. The Holden's five-speeder, in contrast, is somewhat dithery, sometimes holding the wrong gear too long, sometimes making unneeded shifts. Thankfully, both Territory and 'wagon transmissions feature good ‘manual' modes. Shifting is the right way round (forward for down, back for up) and they hold the selected gear even if revs kiss the limiter.

Drive the Sportwagon on an interesting country road, and you'll find that the Holden really does live up to its 'Sportwagon' label. As in other Commodore variants, the steering is bloody brilliant. Great feel, superb accuracy and consistent weighting. Better than most current BMWs, in fact.

The handling isn't bad, either. Sure, the ride is firm at low speed, but the body control is excellent when hustling along a lumpy country backroad. It mightn't be the first choice for comfort-loving passengers, but drivers will adore the way Holden's wagon responds to their inputs with promptness and precision.

And the Ford? Well, there's less grip from the Territory's 17-inch tyres than the Sportwagon's lower-profile 18-inch rubber. The Ford's front end pushes into mild understeer at corner speeds where the Holden is going round like it's on rails. Still, the Territory can be hustled with impressive speed for an SUV.

The steering is sharp around centre - sharper even than the Sportwagon - but once used to the Territory's reactiveness you discover it can be made to string corners together in fluid, graceful sequences. Its softer suspension means the handling's rhythm is more relaxed than the Sportwagon, but once you're tuned in a keen driver will find a lot to like. Passengers will love it too; the Ford's ride is superbly supple. And while the Territory's suspension smothers bumps, it also delivers fine body control.

Both Ford and Holden have beautifully calibrated electronic chassis stability systems (Territory RWD originally launched with only traction control, but ESP was added to the standard spec list in mid 2007). Especially on dirt, both display the benefit of local knowledge ... and tuning. Ford's DSC and Holden's ESP are based on the same Bosch hardware set, and they provide a reliable safety net without persistent interference with throttle and brakes. If only all car makers could manage this ...

Switch off the systems (both Ford and Holden permit total ESP disablement) and you'll find a pair of dirt- road oversteer champions. Territory and Sportwagon prove that rear-wheel drive, plus a decent wheelbase, good weight distribution, sound suspension calibration and responsive drivetrain, spells sideways machine supreme. Both Ford and Holden seem to have embraced the concept that making a sensible and practical choice shouldn't mean the end of enjoyment.

But fun for the person behind the wheel, while welcome, is a secondary consideration in cars like these. Passenger seat comfort and flexibility, storage, visibility and cargo capacity are more important reasons for choosing Territory or Sportwagon.

Territory is great on big trips. Long stints behind the wheel aren't a problem. Visibility ahead and to the sides is good, and the driving position is practically perfect, with a great range of adjustment available on seat and steering column.

The Ford's rear seat is also great. The width of Territory's cabin means the second row is a place where three large adults can be comfortable for hours. There's ample space in every direction and the seat's cushion and backrest are generously dimensioned, well angled and very supportive. As well, Ford's interior designers thoughtfully included a bunch of places to stash stuff.

One of Territory's clear flexibility advantages over Sportwagon is the option of adding a hideaway third row of seating. This costs $1800 ($300 more than at launch), but turns the Ford into a car capable of shifting seven. The third-row package includes the addition of fore-aft adjustment to the 60/40-split second-row seat. You can create enough leg room for adults to squeeze into the third row, but they're not going to want to spend very long back there.

The Ford also has a clear-cut cargo advantage with 1153 litres (floor to ceiling) behind its rear seat, almost 30 percent more than the Holden's 895 litres. The inclusion of the optional third-row seat reduces capacity to 441 litres but doesn't affect the Territory's load capacity when stowed. With second-row seats folded, both Sportwagon and its rival deliver a practically flat cargo area around two metres long.

There's little wrong with the Holden's driving position, but its visibility isn't as good. VE Commodore's fat (and strong) A-pillars are as much of a problem in the wagon as the sedan. But it's behind the front seats that the contrast between Sportwagon and Territory is sharpest. The Holden has a seat that's almost as good as the Ford's, but it's less well equipped back there. For example, there's only a pair of vestigial, fixed head restraints for the outboard passengers and there are few places to stow stuff. Ford provides three adjustable head restraints, as well as storage for everything from drink bottles (doors) to banana skins (flip-out bin with washable, pull-out liner in rear of centre console).

In the end, the Territory's nose-to-tail user-friendliness and greater flexibility haul it past the Sportwagon. The Holden is a damned good wagon, with involving dynamics, great looks and strong performance. There's little else with this blend of abilities for the money.

But the Ford is simply the better family wagon, or part-time people mover, or plain, old-fashioned station wagon. Its fuel consumption is heavier, but this must be weighed against its superior comfort and broader range of abilities. It's a price worth paying. For those who need to carry people or stuff frequently or far, it's the better car for life in the large lane.































































































SPECIFICATIONS:
  FORD TERRITORY TS HOLDEN SPORTWAGON
Price: $43,990/As tested $45,790* $42,790/As tested $42,790
 
Engine: In-line 6, dohc, 24v V6 (60°), dohc, 24v
Layout: Front engine (north-south), rear drive Front engine (north-south), rear drive
Capacity: 3.984 litres 3.564 litres
Power: 190kW @ 5250rpm 195kW @ 6500rpm
Torque: 383Nm @ 2500rpm 340Nm @ 2600rpm
Transmission: 4-speed automatic 5-speed automatic
Dimensions (L/W/H): 4856/1898/1714mm 4896/1899/1471mm
Wheelbase: 2842mm 2915mm
Weight: 2035kg 1829kg
Fuel/capacity: 91 octane/75 litres 91 octane/73 litres
Fuel consumption: 13.2L/100km (test average) 11.2L/100km (test average)
Boot capacity: 441/1153/2541 litres 895/2000 litres
Warranty: 3 years/100,000km 3 years/100,000 km
Red Book 3-year resale: 61% 55%
0-100km/h 8.4 sec# 7.8 sec#
NCAP rating
???? (Aus) n/a
Verdict: ????? ???½?
 
For: Ride comfort, refinement, handling, space, interior flexibility Looks, sporty handling, performance, fuel consumption
Against: Four-speed auto is a speed too few; practical interior showing its age Firm ride not great for comfort; storage spaces insufficient
  *Includes third-row seating ($1800)  

More research
Ford Territory -- Carsales Network 7-day test: here
Holden Sportwagon range -- Carsales Network launch review: here


 


 


 

Share this article
Written byJohn Carey
See all articles
Our team of independent expert car reviewers and journalistsMeet the team
Stay up to dateBecome a carsales member and get the latest news, reviews and advice straight to your inbox.
Disclaimer
Please see our Editorial Guidelines & Code of Ethics (including for more information about sponsored content and paid events). The information published on this website is of a general nature only and doesn’t consider your particular circumstances or needs.

If the price does not contain the notation that it is "Drive Away", the price may not include additional costs, such as stamp duty and other government charges.
Download the carsales app
    AppStoreDownloadGooglePlayDownload
    App Store and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.
    © CAR Group Ltd 1999-2024
    In the spirit of reconciliation we acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.